P R A T I S H T A

Loading

  • Established in 2007 | Excellence in Pharmacy Education
NAAC Accredited with Grade A Pharmacy Council of India JNTUH SBTET ISO 9001 Certified National Service Scheme
Apply Now Apply Now
Pratishta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Apply Now Apply Now
NAAC

Accreditation, Quality Assurance & Continuous Improvement

NAAC Accreditation & Quality Assurance

Pratishta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences is committed to maintaining quality in teaching, learning, academic development, research, student support, infrastructure, governance and institutional practices. The institution has been accredited by the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) with an ‘A’ Grade, reflecting its commitment to academic quality and continuous institutional improvement.

NAAC ‘A’ Grade

Accredited by the National Assessment and Accreditation Council, reflecting the Institution’s focus on academic quality and continuous improvement.

The NAAC section provides access to the institution's accreditation-related information, Extended Profile, criterion-wise metrics and supporting documents. These resources provide transparency regarding the institution's academic processes, student development, research activities, infrastructure, governance, quality assurance practices and institutional values.

NAAC accreditation certificate of Pratishta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Extended Profile
Extended Profile 1.1
Extended Profile 2.1
Extended Profile 2.2 PDF
Extended Profile 2.3
Extended Profile 3.1
Extended Profile 3.2
Criterion 1 – Curricular Aspects
1.1 – Curricular Planning and Implementation
1.1.1 The Institution ensures effective curriculum delivery through a well-planned and documented process. PDF 1.1.2 The Institution adheres to the academic calendar, including the conduct of Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE). PDF
1.1.3

Teachers of the Institution participate in activities related to curriculum development and assessment of the affiliating University and/or are represented on relevant academic bodies.

1.2 – Academic Flexibility
1.2.1

Percentage of programmes in which Choice Based Credit System (CBCS) / elective course system has been implemented.

1.2.2

Number of Add-on / Certificate programmes offered during the last five years.

1.2.3

Average percentage of students enrolled in Certificate / Add-on programmes against the total number of students during the last five years.

1.3 – Curriculum Enrichment
1.3.1

Institution integrates cross-cutting issues relevant to professional ethics, gender, human values, environment and sustainability into the curriculum.

1.3.2 Average percentage of courses that include experiential learning through project work, field work or internship during the last five years. PDF 1.3.3 Percentage of students undertaking project work, field work or internships during the latest completed academic year. PDF
1.4 – Feedback System
1.4.1

Institution obtains feedback on the syllabus and its transaction from relevant stakeholders.

1.4.2

Feedback process of the Institution and its classification according to the applicable options.

Criterion 2 – Teaching-Learning and Evaluation
2.1 – Student Enrollment and Profile
2.1.1 Average enrolment percentage during the last five years. PDF 2.1.2 Average percentage of seats filled against reserved categories, as per the applicable reservation policy, during the last five years, excluding supernumerary seats. PDF
2.2 – Catering to Student Diversity
2.2.1 The Institution assesses the learning levels of students and organises special programmes for advanced learners and slow learners. PDF
2.2.2

Student–full-time teacher ratio during the latest completed academic year.

2.3 – Teaching-Learning Process
2.3.1 Student-centric methods such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem-solving methodologies are used to enhance learning experiences. PDF 2.3.2 Teachers use ICT-enabled tools for an effective teaching-learning process. PDF
2.3.3

Ratio of students to mentors for academic and other related issues during the latest completed academic year.

2.4 – Teacher Profile and Quality
2.4.1

Average percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years.

2.4.2

Average percentage of full-time teachers with Ph.D. and other applicable higher qualifications during the last five years.

2.4.3

Average teaching experience of full-time teachers in the same institution during the latest completed academic year.

2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.5.1

Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode.

2.5.2 Mechanism for dealing with internal and external examination-related grievances is transparent, time-bound and efficient. PDF
2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
2.6.1 Programme and course outcomes for all programmes offered by the Institution are stated, displayed and communicated to teachers and students. PDF 2.6.2 Attainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes is evaluated by the Institution. PDF
2.6.3

Average pass percentage of students during the last five years.

2.7 – Student Satisfaction Survey
2.7.1

Online student satisfaction survey regarding the teaching-learning process.

Criterion 3 – Research, Innovations and Extension
3.1 – Resource Mobilisation for Research
3.1.1

Grants received from government and non-governmental agencies for research projects, endowments and chairs during the last five years.

3.1.2

Percentage of teachers recognised as research guides during the latest completed academic year.

3.1.3

Percentage of departments having research projects funded by government and non-government agencies during the last five years.

3.2 – Innovation Ecosystem
3.2.1

Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations and initiatives for creation and transfer of knowledge.

3.2.2

Number of workshops and seminars conducted on research methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship during the last five years.

3.3 – Research Publications and Awards
3.3.1

Number of Ph.D. scholars registered per eligible teacher during the last five years.

3.3.2

Number of research papers per teacher in journals notified on the UGC website during the last five years.

3.3.3

Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/international conference proceedings per teacher during the last five years.

3.4 – Extension Activities
3.4.1

Extension activities are carried out in the neighbourhood community to sensitise students to social issues and support their holistic development.

3.4.2

Number of awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government or government-recognised bodies during the last five years.

3.4.3 Number of extension and outreach programmes conducted through NSS, NCC, Red Cross, YRC and similar initiatives during the last five years. PDF
3.4.4

Average percentage of students participating in extension activities during the last five years.

3.5 – Collaboration
3.5.1

Number of collaborative activities for research, faculty exchange, student exchange and internships per year.

3.5.2

Number of functional MoUs with institutions, universities, industries, corporate houses and other organisations during the last five years.

Criterion 4 – Infrastructure and Learning Resources
4.1 – Physical Facilities
4.1.1 The Institution has adequate infrastructure and physical facilities for teaching and learning, including classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment and related facilities. PDF 4.1.2 The Institution has adequate facilities for cultural activities, sports, games, gymnasium, yoga and related student activities. PDF 4.1.3 Percentage of classrooms and seminar halls with ICT-enabled facilities such as smart classrooms and LMS. PDF 4.1.4 Average percentage of expenditure, excluding salary, for infrastructure augmentation during the last five years. PDF
4.2 – Library as a Learning Resource
4.2.1 Library is automated using an Integrated Library Management System (ILMS). PDF
4.2.2

Institution has subscription for applicable electronic resources.

4.2.3

Average annual expenditure for purchase of books/e-books and subscription to journals/e-journals during the last five years.

4.2.4

Percentage of daily library usage by teachers and students during the latest completed academic year.

4.3 – IT Infrastructure
4.3.1 Institution regularly updates its IT facilities, including Wi-Fi infrastructure. PDF
4.3.2

Student–computer ratio during the latest completed academic year.

4.3.3

Bandwidth of internet connection available at the Institution.

4.4 – Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
4.4.1

Average percentage of expenditure incurred on maintenance of infrastructure and physical and academic support facilities, excluding salary, during the last five years.

4.4.2 Established systems and procedures for maintaining and utilising physical, academic and support facilities including laboratories, library, sports facilities, computers and classrooms. PDF
Criterion 5 – Student Support and Progression
5.1 – Student Support
5.1.1 Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the Government during the last five years. PDF 5.1.2 Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships, freeships and similar support provided by the Institution or non-government agencies during the last five years. PDF 5.1.3 Capacity-building and skill-enhancement initiatives undertaken by the Institution. PDF 5.1.4 Average percentage of students benefited by guidance for competitive examinations and career counselling offered by the Institution during the last five years. PDF 5.1.5 The Institution has a transparent mechanism for timely redressal of student grievances, including matters related to sexual harassment and ragging. PDF
5.2 – Student Progression
5.2.1 Average percentage of placement of outgoing students during the last five years. PDF
5.2.2

Average percentage of students progressing to higher education during the last five years.

5.2.3

Average percentage of students qualifying in state, national or international level examinations during the last five years.

5.3 – Student Participation and Activities
5.3.1 Number of awards/medals won by students for outstanding performance in sports and cultural activities at inter-university, state, national or international levels during the last five years. PDF 5.3.2 Institution facilitates student representation and engagement in administrative, co-curricular and extracurricular activities through established processes and norms. PDF 5.3.3 Average number of sports and cultural events/competitions in which students participated during the last five years. PDF
5.4 – Alumni Engagement
5.4.1 Registered Alumni Association contributing to the development of the Institution through financial and/or other support services. PDF
5.4.2

Alumni contribution during the last five years.

Criterion 6 – Governance, Leadership and Management
6.1 – Institutional Vision and Leadership
6.1.1 Governance of the Institution is reflective of and aligned with its vision and mission. PDF 6.1.2 Effective leadership is visible through institutional practices such as decentralisation and participative management. PDF
6.2 – Strategy Development and Deployment
6.2.1 Institutional Strategic / Perspective Plan is effectively deployed. PDF 6.2.2 Functioning of institutional bodies is effective and efficient through appropriate policies, administrative structures, appointment and service rules and procedures. PDF
6.2.3

Implementation of e-governance in relevant areas of institutional operation.

6.3 – Faculty Empowerment Strategies
6.3.1 Institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff. PDF
6.3.2

Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fees of professional bodies during the last five years.

6.3.3

Average number of professional development and administrative training programmes organised for teaching and non-teaching staff during the last five years.

6.3.4

Average percentage of teachers undergoing online or face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes and other applicable professional development programmes during the last five years.

6.3.5 Institution has a performance appraisal system for teaching and non-teaching staff. PDF
6.4 – Financial Management and Resource Mobilisation
6.4.1 Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly. PDF
6.4.2

Funds and grants received from non-government bodies, individuals and philanthropists during the last five years.

6.4.3 Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and optimal utilisation of resources. PDF
6.5 – Internal Quality Assurance System
6.5.1 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) contributes significantly to institutionalising quality assurance strategies and processes. PDF 6.5.2 Institution periodically reviews teaching-learning processes, structures, methodologies and learning outcomes through the IQAC and records incremental improvements. PDF
6.5.3

Quality assurance initiatives undertaken by the Institution.

Criterion 7 – Institutional Values and Best Practices
7.1 – Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities
7.1.1

Measures initiated by the Institution for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years.

7.1.2 Facilities for alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures. PDF 7.1.3 Facilities and practices for the management of degradable and non-degradable waste. PDF 7.1.4 Water conservation facilities available in the Institution. PDF 7.1.5 Green campus initiatives undertaken by the Institution. PDF 7.1.6 Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution and related recognition, where applicable. PDF 7.1.7 Institution provides a disabled-friendly and barrier-free environment. PDF 7.1.8 Institutional efforts and initiatives for providing an inclusive environment promoting tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal, socioeconomic and other diversities. PDF 7.1.9 Sensitisation of students and employees towards constitutional obligations, values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens. PDF 7.1.10 Institution has a prescribed code of conduct for students, teachers, administrators and other staff and conducts periodic programmes relating to the code of conduct. PDF 7.1.11 Institution celebrates and organises national and international commemorative days, events and festivals. PDF
7.2 – Best Practices
7.2.1 Description of two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per the applicable NAAC format. PDF
7.3 – Institutional Distinctiveness
7.3.1 Institutional performance in an area distinctive to its priority and thrust. PDF
Quality Commitment

NAAC accreditation and quality assurance are part of the Institution's continuing commitment to academic excellence and institutional development. Through systematic evaluation, documentation, review and continuous improvement, Pratishta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences strives to strengthen the quality of education, student support, research, infrastructure, governance and institutional practices.

  • Quality Education
  • Continuous Improvement
  • Academic Excellence
  • Student Development
Supporting Documents

Official NAAC documents open in a new tab for metrics that have a published PDF. Remaining metric records will be linked here when those files are made available by the Institution.